From: "Jim Barrows" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I'll agree with Wendy up to here... and then it's a style differerence... > the html:img tag also prepends the context information to the image, > so it's portable between contexts. In my experience, everything is portable, > everything changes, iow Mr. Murphy lives in my back pocket so I tend to code > with maximum flexibility in mind.
Why would you need the context name as part of your image link in order to make it portable? If your images are beneath your context, a relative link will pick them up regardless of what the context name is. That's why I suggested doing away with the leading slash, but since I don't use <html:img> I didn't realize it was required (as Erik pointed out). I still have no idea what Caroline's problem is, though... it's probably going to be something simple. On Unix the next thing I would suspect is file permissions, less so on Windows but still... is the file marked hidden or something weird? -- Wendy Smoak --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
