I should probably post this stuff on XDoclet's list ...
David Durham wrote:
That's good information; I read it with vigor... As you can tell, I'm
excited by the prospects of using XDoclet instead of <insert proprietary
tool here>.
And, I think I get the gist of Struts related support provided in
XDoclet, but I have a couple of questions. 1 -- How good is the
DynaValidatorForm support? I saw the announcement:
http://www.systemmobile.com/code/xdoclet-dynaform-README.txt. That
looks well and good, but there appear to be some discrepancies:
Class Level Tags:
@struts.dynaform
Attributes:
name - The name of the form bean in the config. [required]
type - The type of DynaForm. [required]
description - Descriptive string. [optional]
className - The config class. [optional]
validate - If set, the validator code will generate a form definition
for this dynaform. [optional]
Method Level Tags:
@struts.dynaform-field
Attributes:
name - The name of the form field. If not specified, the property name
of the method is used. [optional]
What method? I thought this was a dynaform?
type - The type of field. If not specified, the return type of the
getter is used. [optional]
Again, we're talking about dynaforms...
I'm going to put these XDoclet tags in an Action, I presume. Is there support for
DispatchActions?
I'm just starting to dig into this tool. I may end up adding some code of my own to
these projects, just so I don't sound like a whiner.
Thanks,
Dave
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]