[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I pulled this old thread off the archives in order to give context to a couple of questions....
And if you want to do a javascript validation on it as well, don't forget to set the <var-jstype> attribute to be regexp in the validation.xml.
Is this a valid tag? I don't see any reference to it in the dtd.
You must be looking at an old DTD. The 1.1.3 and 1.2.0 versions of the validator DTD both have this tag.
For a MASK validation, you don't need to set the var-jstype attribute. This looks like you are quoting me (at least I remember saying this...) and I think when I said that I was talking about a custom validator and not about the builtin MASK validator. For MASK you can just use var-name and var-value safely.
snip of the part I don't have an answer to.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Berke, Wayne [IT]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2004 2:03 PM Subject: Validation with 2 masks?
I'd like to a property validation against 2 different regular expressions with 2 different error messages.
This seems like a fairly common use. Is there a best practice for it?
Wayne
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]