Terry,

I share your concern about OT messages drowning out valid Struts
questions.  However, in this particular case, it could be a matter of
not a whole lot of people having experience with the problem.

For the situation you have, I have to say I just avoided it when I
encountered it.  At the time, I needed more out of my form than what I
wanted to do with Dyna*Form anyway, so I went the traditional
ActionForm way and did my validation in the validate() method.

I don't know enough about validator in order to confirm that
multi-level indexed property validation is not supported, but if I
*had* to guess, I'd say it isn't.  If I'm right, then other options
you can look at are creating a custom validator, or using the
traditional validate() method (on an ActionForm or a DynaActionForm
extension).

Hubert


On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 11:28:51 -0600, Terry Roe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greetings,
> 
> I find it interesting that most of the recent activity on this mailing
> list has to do with items such as .NET, AOP, Flash, Crystal Reports, and
> even Notepad!  I don't mind the off topic posts, as they are usually at
> least tangentially related to the topic of this list and are interesting
> in themselves.  However, I have posted a couple of Struts questions
> dealing with production code I am trying to develop and are directly
> related to Struts usage.  I received a confirmation that one item wasn't
> currently supported in Struts (indexed property validation with
> JavaScript), but no suggestions on how I might work around it, and
> another on which I received no help, described below.
> 
> I'd think there'd be at least one or two gurus watching this list that
> could at least say "you can't do that" or" here's what you might try."
> I've seen the big guns respond to "easier" issues, but no one addresses
> "tough" ones like the one below.  Maybe it's too much effort, or maybe
> I've breached protocol somehow in the way I've asked for help.  It would
> be nice to at least get a response to an issue that is directly related
> to the topic of this mailing list.
> 
> I don't mean to be rude, and I hope I'm not coming across that way.  But
> I've searched and searched for information on the issue below and have
> come up empty.  I came to the one place that I thought would be of some
> help and have received no response.  Could someone please tell me where
> to go (and, yes, you may say GTH if that is the correct answer) to find
> answers to questions on Struts functionality and usage?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> TR
> 
> Terry Roe wrote:
> Re: Validation for Two Levels of Indexed Properties
> 
> > Can Struts validate more than one level of indexed properties?  First
> > level works great.  Love it.  I've tried the following (phaseList and
> > procedureList are two indexed properties) to get more than one level to
> > work without success:
> >
> > <field property="units"
> > indexedListProperty="plan.phaseList.procedureList"
> > depends="required,intRange">
> >
> > <field property="units"
> > indexedListProperty="plan.phaseList[].procedureList"
> > depends="required,intRange">
> >
> > <field property="procedureList.units"
> > indexedListProperty="plan.phaseList" depends="required,intRange">
> >
> > <field property="procedureList[].units"
> > indexedListProperty="plan.phaseList" depends="required,intRange">
> >
> > Is multi-level, indexed property validation supported?  If so, can
> > someone relate the syntax to use?  If not, can someone confirm than only
> > one level of indexed property validation is supported?
> >
> > TR
> >
> >

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to