On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 17:30:00 -0400, Kichline, Don (EM, PTL)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now this is something I had not realized.  What is going to replace them?

In the short term, you'll have the ability to easily use JSF with
Struts via the Struts-Faces tag library.  It's going to get proposed
for release fairly imminently -- in the mean time, nightly builds are
available at:

  http://cvs.apache.org/builds/jakarta-struts/nightly/struts-faces/

The advantage of doing this is that JSF components are much more
functional that the Struts HTML tags, and you'll be able to use more
complex components (tables, grids, tree controls, etc) that are
becoming available now that JSF is a released standard.

Longer term, it is likely that the core architecture of Struts will be
updated to integrate even more seamlessly with JSF as the view tier,
while focusing its own functionality on the controller tier.

Craig

> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Craig McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 5:25 PM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: Re: non-standard attributes in taglib
> 
> An orthogonal issue that is important to your decision making
> processing is that the current Struts HTML tags are basically
> considered legacy by the Struts developers, and are unlikely to
> receive a lot of attention other than refactoring them a little so
> they can be released separately from the Struts core, and perhaps
> fixing a few bugs along the way.  I would think twice about committing
> to new development, especially for large scale or long term projects,
> based on them -- whether or not they included the extra attributes for
> IE-specific behaviors.
> 
> Craig
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to