This is interesting, let me ask another related question :
What about a thread (started from the Action) that just resizes an image and saves it to a file system ? Would that be also a bad idea ? Jano On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 15:18:12 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >I don't understand your response. Memory (physical and virtual) are also >finite resources. Does this mean that instantiating new objects is a Bad >Thing within an action? > >Dennis > > > > >bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >12/06/2004 03:14 PM >Please respond to >"Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >To >Struts Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >cc > >Subject >Re: [OT]Threads and Servlets Question > > > > > > >threads are also a finite resource ( particularly on Linux ). > >--b > > >On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 21:13:57 +0100, bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> because you should use a message driven bean to do something like that. >> >> --b >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 11:48:15 -0700, Jim Barrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >wrote: >> > Okay... I know I've read this somewhere, but can't remember. >> > Why is it recommended you NOT start a thread inside a servlet, which >would translate to "Why is it a bad idea to start a thread inside an >action?". >> > And, can you point me at some documentation? >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > >> > >> >> >> -- >> http://www.revoltingdigits.com >> https://jestate.dev.java.net >> > > >-- >http://www.revoltingdigits.com >https://jestate.dev.java.net > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
