Object creation with modern JVM's is not that big a problem. --b
On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 15:18:12 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't understand your response. Memory (physical and virtual) are also > finite resources. Does this mean that instantiating new objects is a Bad > Thing within an action? > > Dennis > > bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > 12/06/2004 03:14 PM > Please respond to > "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To > Struts Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > cc > > Subject > Re: [OT]Threads and Servlets Question > > > > > threads are also a finite resource ( particularly on Linux ). > > --b > > On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 21:13:57 +0100, bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > because you should use a message driven bean to do something like that. > > > > --b > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 11:48:15 -0700, Jim Barrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Okay... I know I've read this somewhere, but can't remember. > > > Why is it recommended you NOT start a thread inside a servlet, which > would translate to "Why is it a bad idea to start a thread inside an > action?". > > > And, can you point me at some documentation? > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > http://www.revoltingdigits.com > > https://jestate.dev.java.net > > > > -- > http://www.revoltingdigits.com > https://jestate.dev.java.net > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- http://www.revoltingdigits.com https://jestate.dev.java.net --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]