Niall, I would agree with you until a customer makes XHTML conformance a requirement in the contract. Strict XHTML conformance is very important to some customers, for various reasons.
As previously posted, getting rid of the "name" attribute on the <form> tag could be troublesome. But closing the <input> tags shouldn't be that hard in XHTML mode. Hopefully someone can be kind and make the changes. --Marty --- Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 2:31 PM +0000 12/14/04, Niall Pemberton wrote: > >Joe, maybe you were thinking of this one: > > > >http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15023 > > No, but that's just because I didn't remember it ;-) > > That one generated a lot of discussion, so apparently people think > it's important. I have to admit that I gave up worrying about strict > HTML validation a long time ago. Still, the one Niall points to > documents most of the issues, so anyone who wants to jump in and > figure out the implementation details and provide a patch is > encouraged to do so! > > Joe > > -- > Joe Germuska > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://blog.germuska.com > "Narrow minds are weapons made for mass destruction" -The Ex > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
