On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 10:57:02 -0800, Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This piece of code and this discussion is CLEARLY not appropriate to > the WIKI and is CLEARLY appropriate right where it is. This is just > more committer hybris and puffery. There should be MORE CODE on the > list. That way the traffic could be avoided by reference to the > archives. At least this is a legitimate point of view.
The only real relation such a filter has to Struts is that it happens to be based on the servlet specification, and, being built on the servlet specification, Struts is compatible with it. Discussions of JSF, which you seem to love flaming, are decidedly more on-topic than this particular thread. JSF will soon be a piece of the servlet specification too, and that validates it as strongly as your filter. Shale validates that connection even more. Irrespective of what happens for Struts 2.0, JSF isn't going away. It'll mature and grow into something even more useful than it is today. I believe that merits welcoming such posts to the list without flame. Don't misread me. I'm all for hearing about all manner of Java-related technologies here (especially if it's friday, or you can, in some way, associate beer or Jack Daniels with it!). I just think the communication - in cases - could be done more effectively and efficiently. Those cases seem to be a lot more prevelant lately than I've personally ever noticed before, so I said something. My apologies to anyone offended by my complaint. I merely feel many people that post to the list could be more consciencious when posting or replying to posts. Hopefully, most of us know what is or is not relevant to a particular problem and post only those relevant pieces. The same for stack traces. I have just felt lately like posts have included way more than necessary to convey where a problem might be, and the folks replying seldom bother to cull it down any. My frustration with that, coupled with "life" caused me to lose patience and express myself more strongly than I probably should have. Again, I apologize. > Frankly, the list policemen cause more difficulties on this list than > they solve in my opinion. This, however, was close to the Keystone > Cops. Ridiculous! > > Jack -- Eddie Bush --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
