On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 12:40:51 -0500, Kris Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Even more bizarre that it's a sibling Apache project. Along that same line, I > thought this was just hilarious:
I'm taking this in a friendly competitive way rather then as animosity. > > http://www.lightbody.net/~plightbo/archives/000144.html > > Because, and I'll risk a generalization here, the WebWork devs have always > been > pretty public about their loathing of Struts. Now that there's a lot of buzz > around Rails, Stuts seems to have magically fallen off their radar. The interesting things is that, they're right about direct mapping tables to UI. If you're trying to do anything beyond CRUD direct mapping doesn't work. I've even agreed with some of their comments about Struts. It has it's warts. However, the warts are going away, and Struts, unlike any of it's leading competitors does JSP better. Then of course, you have the simple fact that I've seen more requests for Struts skills then I have for WebWork or Tapestry. > > I'll just take another quick second to use these two examples as an indirect > way > to compliment the Struts community (especially the devs) on how they deal with > other web frameworks. There's more to a project than the code... > > Quoting James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > http://howardlewisship.com/blog/2005/01/safety-first.html > > > > > > And I didn't even realize there was animosity....what a fool I've been :P > > > > -- > > James Mitchell > > Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist > > EdgeTech, Inc. > > 678.910.8017 > > AIM: jmitchtx > > -- > Kris Schneider <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > D.O.Tech <http://www.dotech.com/> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- James A Barrows --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
