http://www.qos.ch/logging/thinkAgain.jsp
Vic wrote:
That's great about Java. I am going the other way, from JCL to the new log4j: http://logging.apache.org/log4j/docs/ugli.html
.V
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Today I find myself converting an existing webapp from using Log4J directly to using JCL instead. As per the JCL User's Guide, I'm creating a private static Log variable in all my classes, Struts Actions included.
My question is, why is this OK? Static variables in Actions are a Bad Thing, that's a ell-known fact, but why is a Log instance an exception to this rule?
Is it only a bad thing to have static members that might be updated? Is that the difference here? Thanks all!
-- Kris Schneider <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> D.O.Tech <http://www.dotech.com/>
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
