To the "why is it named Shale instead of Struts" question ... I would very much like it to be called Struts, but in the Apache development culture that cannot happen until the committers agree that it *is* Struts. I have proposed that Shale indeed be adopted in that way, and will continue to encourage it; the Struts committers have not (yet? :-) accepted that part of the proposal, but have decided that Shale deserves a home here as a formal subproject (instead of an ephemeral "sandbox" thing that would have a harder time gaining traction because people would wonder about its longevity).
A historical precedent for this idea was the way that the new servlet container architecture (which ultimately became the container in Tomcat 4) was introduced -- it was called Catalina (and that happens to still be the package name), and was not allowed to be called "Tomcat" until it was officially accepted by the Tomcat developers as the selected architecture for Tomcat 4. Craig On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 17:03:09 -0500, Alex Kravets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So what do you guys think? > http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=31509 > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
