On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 21:09:46 +0100, PA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Static inner classes, static. Those are simply an extension of the > namespace. Contrast this with the sorry freak of nature which are plain > inner classes.
HAHAHAH! I just inherited some code with a pile of inner classes, and I have to say I agree with you on that "sorry freak of nature" comment. Still not sure I dig static ICs, but am willing to give them the benefit of the doubt...for now. Larry --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]