On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 21:09:46 +0100, PA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Static inner classes, static. Those are simply an extension of the
> namespace. Contrast this with the sorry freak of nature which are plain
> inner classes.

HAHAHAH! I just inherited some code with a pile of inner classes, and
I have to say I agree with you on that "sorry freak of nature"
comment. Still not sure I dig static ICs, but am willing to give them
the benefit of the doubt...for now.

Larry

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to