I'd switch on logging in debug mode - digester I think tells you loads about
what its doing, maybe you can work out from that whats happening at startup.

Niall

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Stephen Peck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 1:23 AM
> Thanks for the reply Niall,
>
> Yes I am sure that the message is not being displayed in the output of
> Tomcat's startup ;
>
> - Initializing Coyote HTTP/1.1 on http-8080
> - Initialization processed in 2406 ms
> - Starting service Catalina
> - Starting Servlet Engine: Apache Tomcat/5.0.24
> - XML validation disabled
> - Create Host deployer for direct deployment ( non-jmx )
> - Processing Context configuration file URL file:C:\Program Files\Apache
> Software Foundation\Tomcat 5.0\conf\Catalina\localhost\admin.xml
> - Initializing, config='org.apache.struts.util.LocalStrings',
> returnNull=true
> - Initializing, config='org.apache.struts.action.ActionResources',
> returnNull=true
> - Initializing, config='org.apache.webapp.admin.ApplicationResources',
> returnNull=true
> - Processing Context configuration file URL file:C:\Program Files\Apache
> Software Foundation\Tomcat 5.0\conf\Catalina\localhost\finance_revamp.xml
> - Tiles definition factory loaded for module ''.
> - Loading validation rules file from '/WEB-INF/validator-rules.xml'
> - Loading validation rules file from '/WEB-INF/validation.xml'
> - Processing Context configuration file URL file:C:\Program Files\Apache
> Software Foundation\Tomcat 5.0\conf\Catalina\localhost\ROOT.xml
> - Processing Context configuration file URL file:C:\Program Files\Apache
> Software Foundation\Tomcat 5.0\conf\Catalina\localhost\tomcat-docs.xml
> - Starting Coyote HTTP/1.1 on http-8080
> - JK2: ajp13 listening on /0.0.0.0:8009
> - Jk running ID=0 time=0/235  config=C:\Program Files\Apache Software
> Foundation\Tomcat 5.0\conf\jk2.properties
> - Server startup in 13110 ms
> found mapping type
> au.com.plantechnology.common.struts.action.mapping.SecureActionMapping
>
> The last line is displayed on a call to SecureAction which is expecting
> a SecureActionMapping.
>
> It just doesn't seem to make sense.  I have continued searching the web
> and have still found nada.  The configuration seems to be correct, I
> have changed the name of the property, added new ones and still
> nothing.  It is definitely creating the correct mapping type but just
> not initialising it.
>
> Steve.



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to