I'd switch on logging in debug mode - digester I think tells you loads about what its doing, maybe you can work out from that whats happening at startup.
Niall ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stephen Peck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 1:23 AM > Thanks for the reply Niall, > > Yes I am sure that the message is not being displayed in the output of > Tomcat's startup ; > > - Initializing Coyote HTTP/1.1 on http-8080 > - Initialization processed in 2406 ms > - Starting service Catalina > - Starting Servlet Engine: Apache Tomcat/5.0.24 > - XML validation disabled > - Create Host deployer for direct deployment ( non-jmx ) > - Processing Context configuration file URL file:C:\Program Files\Apache > Software Foundation\Tomcat 5.0\conf\Catalina\localhost\admin.xml > - Initializing, config='org.apache.struts.util.LocalStrings', > returnNull=true > - Initializing, config='org.apache.struts.action.ActionResources', > returnNull=true > - Initializing, config='org.apache.webapp.admin.ApplicationResources', > returnNull=true > - Processing Context configuration file URL file:C:\Program Files\Apache > Software Foundation\Tomcat 5.0\conf\Catalina\localhost\finance_revamp.xml > - Tiles definition factory loaded for module ''. > - Loading validation rules file from '/WEB-INF/validator-rules.xml' > - Loading validation rules file from '/WEB-INF/validation.xml' > - Processing Context configuration file URL file:C:\Program Files\Apache > Software Foundation\Tomcat 5.0\conf\Catalina\localhost\ROOT.xml > - Processing Context configuration file URL file:C:\Program Files\Apache > Software Foundation\Tomcat 5.0\conf\Catalina\localhost\tomcat-docs.xml > - Starting Coyote HTTP/1.1 on http-8080 > - JK2: ajp13 listening on /0.0.0.0:8009 > - Jk running ID=0 time=0/235 config=C:\Program Files\Apache Software > Foundation\Tomcat 5.0\conf\jk2.properties > - Server startup in 13110 ms > found mapping type > au.com.plantechnology.common.struts.action.mapping.SecureActionMapping > > The last line is displayed on a call to SecureAction which is expecting > a SecureActionMapping. > > It just doesn't seem to make sense. I have continued searching the web > and have still found nada. The configuration seems to be correct, I > have changed the name of the property, added new ones and still > nothing. It is definitely creating the correct mapping type but just > not initialising it. > > Steve. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]