On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 14:19:15 -0500, Slattery, Tim - BLS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What I don't understand is why it does this. Why does the JS > > validation differ from the Java validation? > > JavaScript is NOT Java!! They have confusingly similar names, but they are > totally different. There's no reason to expect that the performance of one > should be similar to the performance of the other in any respect.
Although JavaScript is not Java, the language designers adopted the same syntax for integer literals that is found in Java (and C/C++/C#) ... integer literals with a leading 0 are interpreted to be octal literals, unless they start with 0x or 0X to indicate hexadecimal literals. > Tim Slattery Craig --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
