If you look at the one I mentioned, he discusses everything.
On Tue, 8 Mar 2005 08:44:26 -0600, Justin Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks... > > I recently picked up Rod Johnson's J2EE Design and Development (ISBN: > 0-7645-4385-7), and Chapter 12 is titled "Web-Tier MVC Design"... I'm > going to assume this chapter is pretty similar to the one you mention. > > I agree with you that this author is incredibly clear-minded, and I'm > soaking it all in. Most of the book is model-neutral, and focuses more > on good practices and patterns, which is great because we have not > decided on a model yet. But in chapter 12 he only really discusses > Struts, Maverick, and WebWork. I was hoping for some commentary on JSF > and Tapestry as well, especially regarding why one might choose one over > the other. > > It all boils down to two questions: > 1. Why do you prefer Struts over any other web application framework? > (Tapestry, JSF, Maverick, WebWork, etc) > 2. Why should _I_ prefer <insert framework here>? > > The second question is not meant to make anyone defensive; I'm just > trying to get past > > Thanks, > > -Justin > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dakota Jack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, March 07, 2005 3:30 PM > To: Struts Users Mailing List > Subject: Re: MVC Frameworks > > Rod Johnson (author of Spring and one of the clearest thinkers I have > ever read IMHO) has a good discussion of the options in J2EE > Development without EJB in Chapter 13: Web Tier Design. > > Jack > > On Mon, 7 Mar 2005 14:19:47 -0600, Justin Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Hi there, > > > > I am currently researching different web application frameworks... > JSF, > > Struts, and Tapestry specifically. We are planning to migrate a large > > existing web application to a rigorous model 2 standard using one or > > more of these frameworks, and I am looking for more information on the > > differences between them. My research thus far has turned up only a > few > > sources, and many of them seem religiously biased toward one of them. > > > > If any of you have opinions, or better yet, articles contrasting these > > technologies, please let me know. > > > > Thanks, > > > > -Justin > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > -- > "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its > back." > ~Dakota Jack~ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." ~Dakota Jack~ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
