Fair enough... agree to disagree :) In any case, I would never force something like this on anyone, it would only ever be optional if I had anything to say about it, so it probably wouldn't be a problem anyway. As coded, there is absolutely nothing that says you have to use setupItems, so that goal is achieved in its current form. Take care!
-- Frank W. Zammetti Founder and Chief Software Architect Omnytex Technologies http://www.omnytex.com On Wed, March 9, 2005 3:45 pm, Shey Rab Pawo said: > We probably have beat this to death, Frank, but having the framework > setup pages with declarations in the action mappings is not consistent > with MVC to my way of thinking. I definitley would not do this. I > like to keep things simpler. But, others seem to like it. So, maybe > you have something there. I probably am just being resistent to > change. No more to say on this for me. > > -- > No one ever went blind looking at the bright side of life. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
