I've always felt that class sizes should be reduced wherever possible. Even when the code is extremely simplistic, as should be the case in Actions generally, it's still more difficult to look through a higher volume of code (this is in fact a known metric that most code analysis tools use). DispatchActions and their bretherin seem to fly in the face of this idea. I don't mean to imply they are bad in every case, certainly not, but I personally find them to be a bit overused.
I only mentioned it because of the comment by the OP about DispatchActions being a "best practice". Maybe they are considered that at this point, I just wasn't aware if they are. -- Frank W. Zammetti Founder and Chief Software Architect Omnytex Technologies http://www.omnytex.com On Fri, March 18, 2005 1:08 pm, Dakota Jack said: > Where did you get this idea, Frank? This seems out of the blue on a > thread about validation. I personally like the "new" dispatch action > at http://www.michaelmcgrady.com/button/jsp/dispatch_action.jsp a lot. > > ///;-) > > Jack > > On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 12:25:00 -0500 (EST), Frank W. Zammetti > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Is it really true that DispatchAction is now the accepted "best >> practice"? >> If so I have to say I disagree with that standard (if not, ignore me!) >> > > -- > "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." > ~Dakota Jack~ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
