On 4/27/05, Michael Jouravlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>    <action-mappings>
>      <action
>         path="/Something"
>         type="app.SelectionAction"
>         name="selectionForm"
>         scope="request"   <=========== should be scope="session"
>         validate="false"
>         >
>         <forward name="success" path="/pages/p2.jsp"/>
>      </action>
>   </action-mappings>
> 
> On 4/27/05, Mike Elliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm trying to build an application where:
> >
> > 1) p1.jsp transitions via a link: /do/Something?action=initialize.
> >
> > 2) This causes class app.SelectionAction to have its execute() method 
> > invoked.
> >
> > 3) The execute() method, based on the parameter, initializes the form 
> > passed it.
> >
> > 4) The execute() method then transitions to p2.jsp, which renders the page.
> >
> > 5) A user changes something, then causes a submit to occur.
> >
> > 6) The submit transitions via /do/Something?action=update
> >
> > 7) This causes class app.SelectionAction to have its execute() method 
> > invoked.
> >
> > 8) The execute() method, based on the parameter, stores info from the form.
> >
> > This is a reasonable scenario, right?
> >
> > Somewhere between steps 1 and 3, a new form bean is created.  This is
> > reasonable, I guess.  Anyway, it gets initialized in step 3.  However,
> > somewhere between steps 4 and 8, a second new form is created, losing
> > the information so carefully initialized in step 3.  I don't want to
> > throw away the old bean.  I want to keep using the bean I so painfully
> > initialized in step 3.
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to