>There are several ways to make this transparent to the user!  I can
send details if >you don't know how?

Do send details if you can.
Something like what Martin is suggesting looks like one way.

Thanks.


On 6/3/05, Ray Madigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why are you making your users type in the action anyway.  Why don't you mask
> this so they don't know how you implemented it.  There are several ways to
> make this transparent to the user!  I can send details if you don't know
> how?
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: amol k [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 11:50 AM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: Re: Tricky configuration?
> 
> 
> > Why not just map  /do/* to the action servlet insted of *.do
> 
> http://myserver/Login.do to http://myserver/do/Login, etc is not an issue
> but
> Making the users type http://myserver/do/user/blahblah instead of
> http://myserver/user/blahblah is a usability issue.
> (will have to ultimately do that if there's no other option but I want
> to avoid /do before user/blahblah as far as possible)
> 
> 
> 
> On 6/3/05, Rick Reumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Why not just map
> >
> > /do/* to the action servlet insted of *.do
> >
> > Then all of these would go through Struts..
> >
> > http://myserver/do/Login
> > http://myserver/do/Logout
> > http://myserver/do/user/blahblah
> >
> > This obviously wouldn't go through struts..
> >
> > http://myserver/pages/blahblah.jsp
> >
> > amol k wrote the following on 6/3/2005 2:39 PM:
> > > Here is what I am trying to achieve:
> > >
> > > http://myserver/Login.do --> (maps to) LoginAction
> > > http://myserver/Logout.do --> (maps to) LogoutAction
> > > http://myserver/user/blahblah --> UserPageAction (notice that there is
> > > no .do in this case. blahblah can be replaced by anything at runtime)
> > >
> > > http://myserver/pages/blahblah.jsp --> not handled by ActionServlet
> (obviously)
> > >
> > > I am trying various combinations in web.xml and struts-config.xml
> > > (including configuring /user as a module) but havent yet found a
> > > decent solution.
> > > Any thoughts?
> > >
> > > Thanks in advance.
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Rick
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to