Oh sh&* !
Hubert you had your finger on the problem all along...
Now that I have had my first coffee of the day things are falling in
place.
The problem is that the JSP is posting to an action which did not have the
correct form bean.
So it wasn't able to find the property method.
This raises a question.
Say I have a Dependent and DependentSubmit actions.
The Dependent action gets data from the DB and displays it using the
DependentForm.
The DependentSubmit action is also using the DependentForm.
In the JSP that is executed for the Dependent action this gets executed:
<html-el:checkbox property="dependent.healthEligibilityIndicator"
value="${dependentForm.dependent.healthEligibilityIndicator}"/>
Based on my problems, is it safe to say that the property is resolved
on the action being submitted to and the the value on the action currently
handling the request?
- Glenn
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
07/06/2005 07:29 AM
Please respond to
"Struts Users Mailing List" <user@struts.apache.org>
To
"Struts Users Mailing List" <user@struts.apache.org>
cc
Subject
Re: html-el:checkbox quandary
As Hubert suggested here are some of the details.
<form-beans>
<form-bean name="dependentForm" type=
"hronline.secure.personal.dependents.DependentForm">
</form-bean>
</form-beans>
<action path="/personal/Dependent" type=
"hronline.secure.personal.dependents.DependentAction" name="dependentForm"
scope="request" validate="false">
<forward name="dependent" path=
"/WEB-INF/personal/dependents/dependent.jsp">
</forward>
<forward name="cancel" path="/personal/Dependents">
</forward>
</action>
...
public class DependentForm extends ActionForm {
private DependentVO dependent;
public DependentVO getDependent() {
return dependent;
}
public void setDependent(DependentVO dependentVO) {
dependent = dependentVO;
}
...
}
public class DependentVO extends Dependent implements Serializable {
private String disabledIndicator;
private String dentalEligibilityIndicator;
private String dependentId;
private String fulltimeStudentIndicator;
private String healthEligibilityIndicator;
private String pensionEligibilityIndicator;
....
public String getHealthEligibilityIndicator() {
return healthEligibilityIndicator;
}
public void setHealthEligibilityIndicator(String string) {
healthEligibilityIndicator = string;
}
Once again... I really appreciate your time and patience with this !
- Glenn
Hubert Rabago <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
06/06/2005 05:50 PM
Please respond to
"Struts Users Mailing List" <user@struts.apache.org>
To
Struts Users Mailing List <user@struts.apache.org>
cc
Subject
Re: html-el:checkbox quandary
Yes. Maybe if you include the actual mappings, JSP text, form
declaration, etc, someone will find something. From what you've said,
it should work.
Hubert
On 6/6/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes the form bean is associated with the HTML form.
>
> If I simply do this:
> <c:out value="${dependentForm.dependent.healthEligibilityIndicator}"/>
> It writes out the contents. This takes care of the value attribute.
>
> My question is for the property.
> Can a nested bean property be used in the html-el:checkbox as the
> property?
>
> - Glenn
>
>
> Hubert Rabago <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 06/06/2005 04:24 PM
>
>
>
> Is dependentForm is form bean associated with the HTML form that
> your checkbox is a part of? There could be a typo in your
> struts-config, or your <html:form>, or your form declaration.
>
> Hubert
>
> On 6/6/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I gave it a go and I get this error now... more precise but an error
> none
> > the less...
> > [06/06/05 15:40:53:846 EDT] 5dc35dc3 WebGroup E SRVE0026E:
[Servlet
> > Error]-[No getter method for property
> dependent.healthEligibilityIndicator
> > of bean org.apache.struts.taglib.html.BEAN]:
> > javax.servlet.jsp.JspException: No getter method for property
> > dependent.healthEligibilityIndicator of bean
> > org.apache.struts.taglib.html.BEAN
> >
> >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
