Well, IMO, the funny part of them is that 50% are accurate and valid. 

So, do we now ban people whose opinions do not match ours because they
are "disruptive"?

Great way to build up the community Niall - ban independent thought.

Larry


On 6/30/05, Brandon Goodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i find this thread massively humorous. Can someone collect more of
> marks quotes. I was crying with laughter while i read them :)
> 
> Brandon
> 
> On 6/30/05, Mark Galbreath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Carlos, this sounds like a threat.  That is REALLY intolerable, u obtuse 
> > little shmuck.
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 08:50:47PM -0700, Carlos Duque wrote:
> > } Actually, I wonder just how happy the State of Maryland would be know the
> > } amount of time this fellow expends pontificating on topics far removed
> > } from any work for the Department of Elections.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ********************************************************************************************************************
> > This email and any file transmitted with it may be confidential and is 
> > intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is 
> > addressed.  If you received this email in error please notify the DBM 
> > Service Desk by forwarding this message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> > This email has been scanned by networkMaryland Antivirus Service for the 
> > presence of computer viruses.
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to