On 7/15/05, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One thing that can save some work is that the pseudo-database part of > MailReader is already extracted out into its own module (it's in > apps/dao in the source tree), which can be reused "as is" like it is > in all the other MailReader variants.
I've sometimes wondered if we need even a psuedo-database for MailReader. An interface backed by a set of Maps, might do as well. It would not persist between sessions, but that's not the point of the exercise. Actually, it would be helpful if we had multiple database implementations: XML, RAM, and maybe even SQL using Derby or something. :) -T. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
