Dakota Jack wrote:
Then there is Dave, dear sweet, but
*awww*
ever so odd, Dave, closer to Fig than Isaac.
That much might be true; we have a fairly detailed family tree back to
the very late 1500s and alas, Isaac does not seem to be on it.
I am definitely odd, and I wake up happy about that nearly every day.
If the topic of me and
McGrady was so tiresome, why do you four continually divert bottom
water errors about code analysis to this tripe? What is tiresome,
Dave, and especially so for you, is the code in fact.
You're right, code _is_ tiresome to me. (XML configuration files
positively knock me out.) The "code analysis" comment above must be
directed to the "other three," because I have not been involved in
looking at the "competing" code in question--code _attribution_ is even
MORE tiresome, especially when it's an "I wrote/he wrote" discussion,
where it's not a particularly interesting, difficult, or unique problem
being solved.
Third, those who just sit by and
kiss the-powers-that-be's butts, like you Dave, are even more tiresome
than those who hide the dull edge on their tools by talking about the
weather in Poughkeepsie.
Whose butt am I kissing?! Struts-powers-that-be?! I code most of my
webapps in Lisp and Ruby. As far as I know none of the Struts folks work
much in Lisp or Ruby, although I could be mistaken. Butt-kicking, on
occasion (all that silat and kali has to be useful someday, I just know
it!), but rarely butt-kissing. And I have no dull (or rusty, or pitted)
edges--I'm quite scrupulous about my edged weapons.
But I always enjoy your use of ad hominem attacks rather than saying
useful things--at least you stick to what you're good at.
Dave "I wanna play too!"
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
