Jeff, are you saying we shouldn't use extensions at all?
IIRC, Tiles is extension-based, so wouldn't this mean, at the least,
that we can't use Tiles?
Frank
Jeff Beal wrote:
I think you're missing the point. There's no reason to include .php,
.asp, .jsp, .xml, or .html in *any* page. They don't mean anything.
Furthermore, any assumptions you make about the technology behind a
site based on those extensions is simply not valid. (OT: I'll never
forget the day my 7th grade math teacher announced to our class that
to ASSUME makes an ASS out of U and ME. It's amazing how frequently
the truth of that statement has bitten me.)
-- Jeff
On 7/29/05, John Henry Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nice article. that explains why google save sites the way it is.
So all pages that will not be changed should have no .php, .asp, at most
.html/.shtml. Only dynamically changing pages should use .php, .asp or
.jsp.
John H. Xu
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Frank W. Zammetti
Founder and Chief Software Architect
Omnytex Technologies
http://www.omnytex.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
