On 7/31/05, Nick Heudecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think there are a lot of people out there who feel as you do, but > > backwards-compatibility has always been a major theme for those > > While backwards compatibility is nice, I would rather see a better > framework for the 2.x release. My personal opinion is that version > compatibility should be required between point releases, but all bets > are off for major revisions.
I believe that my dialog stuff is a pretty big step for traditional Struts request/response processing, while being FULLY compatible with current codebase. But seems that those who want innovation, choose different frameworks, while those who stay with Struts, do not want to change the way they are used to do things. > Since we're offering suggestions, I would like to see a simplified > configuration, or none at all, like Wicket. Wicket is good. I would already switched to Wicket, if not for the code that I already have written for Struts. Michael. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
