I will answer myself to have answers in the mailing list archive for the
ones to come after me ;)

>do I understand that correct, that in order to use SSLEXT, I have to use a
>specialized Version of RequestProcessor? 

Yes, as this RequestProcesser checks in processPreprocess if the current
request is a "secure" actionmapping ;)

>What if I use Tiles? Or worse, what if I extended 
>TilesRequestProcessor (processRoles)? 

Simply extend SecureTilesRequestProcessor instead

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to