I will answer myself to have answers in the mailing list archive for the ones to come after me ;)
>do I understand that correct, that in order to use SSLEXT, I have to use a >specialized Version of RequestProcessor? Yes, as this RequestProcesser checks in processPreprocess if the current request is a "secure" actionmapping ;) >What if I use Tiles? Or worse, what if I extended >TilesRequestProcessor (processRoles)? Simply extend SecureTilesRequestProcessor instead --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]