Re: The latest stable version of struts

[Randy Shepherd]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

How many man hours are associated with moving from 1.1 to 1.2.7? What 
are the major challenges?

- -Randy

On Aug 31, 2005, at 4:09 AM, Ted Husted wrote:

I think the situation is similar to which JDK people use. Right now, 
the
bulkof the marketplace is probably using 1.3, with 1.4 gaining ground, 
and
1.5 still considered the newbie.

Likewise, from what ?I hear, it seems that the bulk of the Struts
marketplace is still using 1.1, with 1.2 gaining ground.

As Craig said, the committers consider Struts 1.2.7 to be the "best
available release".

* http://struts.apache.org/acquiring.html

Struts 1.3.x is on its way, and the bugs that we've had to address 
between
1.2.7 and 1.3.x were very minor. Struts 1.2.7 is proving to be a very 
stable
platform, with great new features.

* http://struts.apache.org/userGuide/release-notes.html

We do want to stress that it is *very* important to stay current with
deprecation warnings. We *do* remove deprecated features with each 
release
series. Each release in the 1.x series is compatiable with the series
before, but that is all the we guarantee.

Don't be left behind. If you thnk you might want to use Struts 1.3.x 
later,
our best advice would be to try using Struts 1.2.7 now, and get that 
round
of deprecrations out of the way.

-Ted.

On 8/31/05, souravm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hi Ranjay,

I've also used Struts 1.1 extensively.

However, I believe Struts 1.2 has some advanced features (like
centralized exception handling etc.). So I'm looking for feedback on 
how
Struts 1.2.x otherwise.

Hopefully Craig will read this mail and clarify my doubt.

Regards,
Sourav

-----Original Message-----
From: SINHA Ranjay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 12:40 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: The latest stable version of struts

I have used Struts 1.1 extensively without hiccup but you should take 
a
advice of Craig himself he is one who created this framework.

Ranjay



-----Original Message-----
From: souravm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 12:27 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: The latest stable version of struts

Hi Ranjay,

I believe after 1.1 there are already 1.2.x versions released. Do you
mean to say none of them are stable ?

Regards,
Sourav

-----Original Message-----
From: SINHA Ranjay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 12:02 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: The latest stable version of struts

Struts 1.1 is the one. Infact this is the last final released version.

Cheers

-----Original Message-----
From: souravm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 11:51 AM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: The latest stable version of struts


Hi All,

Can anyone please let me know which is the latest stable version of
Struts to be used which has lesser bugs/problems ?

Regards,
Sourav


**************** CAUTION - Disclaimer *****************
This e-mail contains PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION intended
solely for the use of the addressee(s). If you are not the intended
recipient, please notify the sender by e-mail and delete the original
message. Further, you are not to copy, disclose, or distribute this
e-mail or its contents to any other person and any such actions are
unlawful. This e-mail may contain viruses. Infosys has taken every
reasonable precaution to minimize this risk, but is not liable for any
damage you may sustain as a result of any virus in this e-mail. You
should carry out your own virus checks before opening the e-mail or
attachment. Infosys reserves the right to monitor and review the 
content
of all messages sent to or from this e-mail address. Messages sent to 
or
from this e-mail address may be stored on the Infosys e-mail system.
***INFOSYS******** End of Disclaimer ********INFOSYS***

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Confidentiality Statement:

This message is intended only for the individual or entity to which it
is
addressed. It may contain privileged, confidential information which 
is
exempt
from disclosure under applicable laws. If you are not the intended
recipient,
please note that you are strictly prohibited from disseminating or
distributing
this information (other than to the intended recipient) or copying 
this
information.
If you have received this communication in error, please notify us
immediately
by return email.



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




--
HTH, Ted.
http://www.husted.com/poe/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFDFlYovmgyD0mfSYQRAh4cAJ9GeFFP9uWsnYztusoLkEQi2+NHogCcC2qE
rM0m+U5HmHZquKahzQMA1cs=
=NYT8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]