On Wed, September 14, 2005 11:15 am, Laurie Harper said: > I think your 'semantics' arugment may be confusing two orthogonal sets > of semantics, but I do see where you're coming from.
Could be. Wouldn't be the first time :) > We're well off-topic so I'm keeping this brief, but feel free to follow > up off-list if you want to discuss further. Yeah, definitely OT now... probably no need to continue... it's not in the end a big deal either way I suppose... both our approaches work and neither is so much more right than the other (if at all) that we're going to convince everyone either way, so I'm content to call it a draw and continue on our merry ways :) > L. Frank --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
