>Hi Guys:
>
>I am evaluvating Shale for upcoming project. I wanted to use HTML rather 
>than JSP like Tapestry. I just want to know what you guys think about Clay 
>and Facelets. One thing I liked about Facelets is it doesnt need any extra 
>xml file to define jsf components .

This is also true for clay HTML templating (as of 09-19).  For example:

<span jsfid="loadBundle" var="messages" basename="com.acme.mywidgets" />
<table>
   <tr>
      <td>
            #{messages.city}: 
      <td>      
            <span jsfid="outputText" id="city" 
value="#{managed-bean-name.city}" size=25/>  or
            <input id="city" type=text value="#{managed-bean-name.city}" 
size=25/>    (assumed mapping to outputText)        
</table>
<input id="submit" type="submit" value="#{messages.save}" 
action="#{managed-bean-name.save}" >

The HTML attributes are passed thru to the component values.  The attributes 
that are passed thru are defined in the default clay config file found under 
META-INF of the clay jar.

I was thinking about creating a third rolodex example that used this method.

Gary


>Rgds,
>--Siva Jagadeesan





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to