Yah, that's his goal and the code is not even his.
On 9/22/05, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What do you mean? Is it your goal to say "hey, see that in the > Struts code, I did that!". If that's true, then you are here for the > wrong reason my friend. > > I for one figured you would appreciate Ted's offer seeing as you > would be on equal ground with everyone else. If you are willing to > do the work, and it is something people want, then you need to get it > out there and let people try it. I still don't see where I can get > the source. If this were in CVS on sf.net, anyone could see it, > browse it, make comments and suggestions, you know, like a good > community is supposed to do. > > I have several projects on sf.net. > > There are rules at Apache for dealing with code donated by people who > do not have a license agreement on file. I'll let Ted explain. On > sf.net, you can just upload it and post to this list, and say "here > it is, have fun". > > Am I off base here guys? > > -- > James Mitchell > Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist > Consulting / Mentoring / Freelance > EdgeTech, Inc. > http://www.edgetechservices.net/ > 678.910.8017 > AIM: jmitchtx > Yahoo: jmitchtx > MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Skype: callto://jmitchtx > > > > > > On Sep 22, 2005, at 7:54 PM, Michael Jouravlev wrote: > > > On 9/22/05, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> On Sep 11, 2005, at 2:18 PM, Ted Husted wrote (on Struts Dev): > >> > >>> My thinking is that each application should be separate, with > >>> it's own > >>> Maven build, and no shared code between web applications. Though, > >>> the > >>> MailReader applications could share a business backend, again > >>> with its > >>> own Maven build and unit tests. > >>> > >>> In this vision, we'd have something like > >>> > >>> /apps > >>> - blank > >>> - cookbook > >>> - examples > >>> - mailreader-classic > >>> - mailreader-chain > >>> - mailreader-dao <- business classes > >>> - mailreader-shale > >>> - mailreader-ti > >>> > >>> This might then encourage other mailreader implementations to help > >>> introduce developers to new technologies, like AjaxTags, Dialogs, > >>> and > >>> FormDef, for example. > >>> > >> > >> On 9/20/05, Michael Jouravlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>> Considering Ted's initiative to create more different > >>> implementations > >>> of venerable MailReader and his invitation of non-committeres to > >>> participate, I converted MailReader from standard Struts using > >>> Struts > >>> Dialogs. > >>> > >>> Here it is: http://www.superinterface.com/mailreader > >>> > >> > >> How about if we start a new SourceForge project for alternative > >> MailReaders? I'd still like to do one for FormDef, for example, but I > >> don't want to saddle the Apache team with too many MailReader > >> implementations. :) > >> > > > > I knew that adding my implementation of MailReader (along with Struts > > Dialogs library) into main Struts trunk was too good to be true... > > > > Michael. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." ~Dakota Jack~ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
