Paul, how many applications have you actually built with Hibernate?
--
James Mitchell
Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist
Consulting / Mentoring / Freelance
EdgeTech, Inc.
http://www.edgetechservices.net/
678.910.8017
AIM: jmitchtx
MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skype: jmitchtx
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Benedict" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <user@struts.apache.org>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2005 7:16 PM
Subject: Re: [OT] performance of JDBC only, without Hibernate or iBatis
I think I need to clarify:
I am not being unfair to Larry's point when I say JDBC is faster. You
can't build ontop of JDBC
and then be faster than what you built upon. Reflection is slower than
normal Java access - and if
I can find the stats I will show them.
With that said, IBATIS can be "faster" by its built-in caching so that you
don't have to hit the
database on every DAO method. That's true. I use caching myself -- and
with IBATIS!
My point was a narrow point -- on DB access with no thrills, JDBC will
always be the fastest since
its the most featureless - it is the base standard for ORM tools
themselves.
I think Larry's point and my point are the same, with differing emphasis.
I hope I've been fair :)
-- Paul
__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
