Hi Gary, I am *trying* to write some documentations right now for Clay for my corporation but I am going to submit it back to the community so you can use it and change it as you want.
So basically, I am trying first to describe the issues Clay is solving before describing how it works. I come with the following points : - JSP as a view technologie has several issues (for now). - Hard collaboration between developpers and artists. - Hard to reuse a subview with different managed beans. - No native support for a template framework and Tiles has several integration issues since it's not a JSF component. Agree? Disagree? Something missing? On 11/30/05, Gary VanMatre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi > > > > I got it working (I was using faces as suffix instead og xml) - Looks very > > promising. > > > > Cool, please keep us informed of your progress. I think a Clay/Facelets > comparison would be very helpful. It could also give us some ideas of how we > can improve Clay besides helping folks choose the best fit. > > > > Hermod > > > > Gary > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Alexandre Poitras Québec, Canada --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
