On 12/1/05, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is open source - if you are convinced Struts Action 1.x is the one true > way, feel free to jump in and contribute. Just because Struts Ti may be > right for me, it may not be for you.
That is not what I meant. I meant that I will not buy facelifted Impreza only because it has Saab emblem. If I needed a small fun AWD wagon I go directly to Subaru. If WebWork is better and Struts committers agreed upon that and decided to move to the better codebase, this is all good and I can understand that, and I can move along. I'd just prefer things to be called what they really are. On 12/1/05, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Put another way, my application depends on a Duck API, with methods like > drumstick() and bill() and foot() that do things for me. Am I going to care > if the internal implementation morphs into a Goose instead of a Duck? Naw > ... I might appreciate the fact that I have some additional choices now, but > as long as the framework has modes that walk like a duck and talk like a > duck, I'm going to be satisfied. I will probably be satisfied too. I just don't want Goose to pretend *being* Duck. Michael. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
