ya.. i agree with you Raghu!! I would want minlength validation to work before mask is applied.. But the order in which the validations are specified do not affect the order in which they are applied. I have tried that out.
On 12/15/05, Raghu Kanchustambham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> I'm not sure it matters much which order they're applied in, though, > since all have to pass > >> anyway. > > Order does matter... That will decide which *one* of the error messages to > display to the user when one of these tests fail. > > > > On 12/15/05, Laurie Harper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Deepa Khetan wrote: > > > Is there a way to specify the order of validaions to occur using > > > validation.xml?? I have noticed that "mask" take precedence over > > "minlength" > > > > I'm not sure; maybe the order they're listed will affect the order > > they're applied? I'm not sure it matters much which order they're > > applied in, though, since all have to pass anyway. > > > > L. > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > >
