On 1/9/06, Dennis Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Will it be acceptable if all 3 MockServletContext.log methods wrap a > static commons logging method call?
I wouldn't be averse to using Commons Logging here, but perhaps it would be a little simpler to just write to System.out or System.err, with a system property to control the logging levels actually output? Craig Dennis Byrne > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Craig McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 02:17 AM > >To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' > >Subject: Re: [shale] UnsupportedOperationException w/ Mock Objects > > > >On 1/9/06, Dennis Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> MockServletContext.log and many other methods throw a > >> UnsupportedOperationException. This makes it hard to test many core > parts of > >> MyFaces. > >> > >> Was the intention here for the tester to override > MockServletContext.log, > >> or does MockServletContext assume the tested code simply would/should > not > >> call ExternalContext.log() ? > > > > > >The intent was to incrementally implement the methods that people > actually > >find useful, rather than try to predict everything people would need :-). > >Your example seems like a perfectly good case where we need such an > >implementation. Feel free to file bugs against specific methods that are > >not currently supported (and patches too, if you'd like them implemented > >faster). > > > > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/ > > > >Dennis Byrne > > > > > >Craig > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
