On 1/10/06, Chan, Jim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > - I am taking a good approach to refactoring the existing webapp?
You might be using <f:verbatim> a little more than absolutely necessary. It should only be *required* if you are inside a JSF component like <h:panelGrid> or <h:panelGroup> (or inside a <h:dataTable>), where you have intermixed child components and markup *inside* a container component. For other useds, you should not require them. Just as an example, if you were to compose a table output by writing raw <table>, <tr>, and <td> elements, with JSF components inside the <td>s, no verbatim tags should be required. As Gary will point out, JSF gives you an opportunity to dump JSP if you want, too :-). Using Clay you can write your entire page in pure HTML, with jsfid attributes to tie in component definitions for the dynamic part. Not a <f:verbatim> tag in sight. - Will JSF evolve to a point where <f:verbatim> tag is not needed? Substantial progress was made in JSF 1.2, which is nearing completion. Any input would be appreciated. Thanks. > > Craig