[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I don't think you'd have to throw and catch it. I think it's sufficient > to create an instance of Throwable to check the stack trace. > That is correct.
Before you could get the array (or whatever it is) of the stack trace we'd 'print' the stack trace to a string then parse through it. I don't remember why we were doing that or if we really had to. I am still ashamed of myself. Of course, I also used to regularly write (and split my infinitives) self-modifying assembly language, so I probably shouldn't feel too bad. Dave --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
