On 3/3/06, netsql <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/library/j-shale0228/?ca=dgr-lnxw07Shale > > or WW2? > Which does services better?
"Services" as in the dynamic back end of an AJAX or SOA type request? You can use either .. WW2 lets you use the standard interceptor mechanism that you use for standard POST handling to decorate the handlers, while Shale Remoting lets you either bind directly to a processing method, or indirectly to a Commons Chain based pipeline. "Better" tends to be a more personal evaluation, based on what you like and/or are familiar with -- but both approaches can meet the functional needs. .V Craig
