If it were me, I'd probably suggest putting the binaries under the MIT license.

* http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php

It talks about "software" but doesn't distinguish between source and
object form.

The MIT license also has the virtue of being brief and easy to understand :)

Then, later, when there has been time to review and "sanitize" the
source code, you would be able to include the source in the
distribution under the same license.

-Ted.

On 3/8/06, Leon Rosenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm sorry for OT, but I am pretty stupid with legal stuff, and after
> carefully reading gnu und apache license packages I am as unknowing as
> I was before. Here my problem:
>
> I am trying to convince one of my customers to make some of the libs I
> wrote for him public available. For process reasons the source code of
> the libs will not be available, only the jars would be available and
> redistributeable. I thought publishing the jar under the LGPL would
> make it, but after reading http://www.gnu.org/licenses/lgpl.html I'm
> starting to doubt it.
>
> Since we must have many experts in licensing here, I think there is no
> better place to ask :-)
>
> The jars would be free for copy, modification, usage, all the gpl
> stuff, but not available in sourcecode. This is because the company,
> which owns the code, has to make additional reporting to the
> headquarters in case they would publish the source code and ensure,
> that there are no comments in the source code, that contain
> non-disclosure information. Publishing the jars only would be lot of
> easier for them, and the probability, that they would do it, is
> higher. So under which license do they need to publish the jars?
>
> Or is it something which can be achieved by a trick? Creating a dummy
> application which contains the jars and put the application under
> lgpl, therefore providing source code for the application, but no
> source code for the libs?
>
> any help is highly appreciated
>
> regards
> leon
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


--
HTH, Ted.
** http://www.husted.com/ted/blog/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to