It is - but it also indicates its going to be removed. Typically deprecations are removed in the version following the one thery are deprecated in.
Opnions are great, but if there are conflicting ones then maybe they're better off on the wiki? Niall ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Jouravlev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <user@struts.apache.org> Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 2:33 AM Subject: Re: Submit a html:form with a link <OT> On 3/8/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I see no real need to force people to change working implementations that > use DispatchAction or LookupDispatchAction by deprecating them. Still some do the same job better than other. I am not saying about forcing people. Just telling them that there is a better way. Isn't it what @deprecated for? > We probably > need better docs to explain the different implementations - but peoples > opnions on whats best to use vary widely - some people don't think > DispatchAction should be used at all. Since I don't use any DispatchAction > flavours, I'm going to leave them alone - but thats just my opnion. If I cannot give a birth, does this mean that I cannot have opinion on abortion? ;-) </OT> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
