>From: "Ted Husted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On 3/8/06, Craig McClanahan wrote: > > Basically, I'm going to claim that "anything you can do in an action > > oriented framework can also be done in a component oriented framework" -- > > :) Didn't Turing prove that already :) > > Mathematically, anything we do with an IDE, you can do with punch > cards -- at least, given an infinite number of monkeys :) >
Holy smokes, what have we been doing for the past 50 years? > > > although there will clearly be use cases where it might be *easier* to use > > one type or the other, saying that there is a fundamental difference is not > > accurate :-). > > By the same token, you could also say that there is not a fundamental > difference between declarative programming and object-orientated > programming. > In my book, as long as it has the three basic principles of encapsulation, inheritance and polymorphisms, it is object oriented. Microsoft has claimed less was OOP for years. Gary > :) But, I would wager that there are folks with a clear preference for > one or the other. :) > > -Ted. > http://www.husted.com/ted/blog/ > > > > > > The second session will be an introduction to Shale. > > > > I'll be posting the slides on my Apache page after the conference. > > > > Craig > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
