Leon Rosenberg wrote:
Hey Frank,

even I agree with you most of the time (not meaning this thread, but
more in general) I will play devil's advocate a bit.
Do you remember how I came to you some time ago and said, hey cool
project you have, let me contribute my struts extensions to your
project.
What was your answer then? :-)

That's a fair point :) I have to be honest with you, I don't remember the extensions you refer to. I have no doubt it was exactly as you say though :)

I was *going* to say that the difference is that when the project started it was me and me alone, and that isn't the case any more. There are two other committers, and we have project bylaws that effectively gives them the ability to do things even if I 100% disagree. I started out with complete control, and right now I essentially have none, and I must follow the will of the leadership. Ultimately, we are accountable to the community insofar as if we do a bad job, there will be *no* community :)

Like I said, I was *going* to say that, but it doesn't really change your point... all three of us could still reject your extensions :) You would have to convince the community to convince us we are wrong. So yes, your 100% right, it's no different.

This is too struts-dependent, that - too basical and this thing is
completely out of scope. I'm not complaining, but isn't it the same
reaction you received from the struts commiters yourself?

Yes :)  Your completely right, I have nothing to say :)

There are always two sides of a medal (at least!) :-)
regards

Indeed :)

Leon

Frank

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to