What you probably mean is that "market forces" will decide, but cannot bring yourself to say "market forces". That is too "un-community" like, so Darwin decides is better?
Let me make a suggestion, if only for the advancement of the clarity of thought. Let's talk about the economic pressures of the economy and the ecological pressures of the ecology. Let's stop talking about the economic pressures of the ecology or the ecological presssures of the economy. The recent (30 years ago or so) advancements in the study of the relation of chaos to ecology and to the economy as well as to biology, to steel manufacturing, etc., by the way, make all of this talk so outdated as to remind me of plotiston theory, once in the mix but now out of the running.. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phlogiston_theory . The problem is that the silly religion people have tied so many things to Darwin being wrong that now scientists are afraid to let the public know that Darwin, like every other serious theoretical flucrum, Keplar, Newton, Aristotle, has turned out to be wrong in a fundamental way. This talk about Darwin decides just shows the poverty of thought at the top level around here. It is as if they tipped the country on end and everything loose became a Struts committer or devotee. I have to also tell you, Mark, no one except in a very peripheral sense gets any money from Struts unless you write books (Ted, etc.) or get paid to do it (Craig, etc.). The Darwin analogy is sooooooooooooo bad. Please bring something more to the table than that. People that want to discuss the very real problems of Struts and there relationship to the mix of JSF and Struts would really appreciate it if you and the likes of you would please stay on the ball. Thanks so much. <glug> On 3/18/06, Mark Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Its sound because it's also a principle that doesn't > state that struts or anything is good because its better or because he > influenced a group of people to act in a certain way, but because a > technology survives the ecological pressures of the economy and > projects that adopt such a approach remain profitable. > </glug> > -- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." ~Dakota Jack~
