>Dion Gillard wrote: >> Jonathan, >> >> do you have a list of things that are technically wrong with Struts 1.x? > >Dion, there is a Struts/Webwork merger afoot whereby the Webwork >codebase is being donated to ASF to be the basis of the next version of >Struts, Struts Action Framework 2 or whatever. > >The fact that the Webwork codebase is being used as the basis of the >next version of the framework by the Struts people rather than Struts >itself basically leads to the unavoidable conclusion that the Struts >developers themselves consider Webwork to be better technology.
Johnathon, You didn't answer Dion's question. The question was "Do you have a list of things that are technically wrong with Struts 1.x?" You complain that people don't answer questions on this list and look what you've just done. So do you have an answer? Joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
