Right Dakota, enough of your insulting childishness please.
Like I have said before, there is more to choosing a technology than
just picking the most modern and cutting edge one. Like I have said
before, I don't CARE that Struts 1 is not the most up to date tech, I
care that it a) does what I needed it to do and b) that I was easily
able to start developing with it because there were lots of books and
online tutorials, more than for any other tech I was considering at the
time. What I am doing does not require the latest and greatest bleeding
edge stuff, but I needed readily available help to get started quickly.
Struts 1 gave me that so I am happy. I don't for one second regret
choosing Struts 1 and I don't feel I have been let down by the struts
development team.
You obviously do feel let down but not everyone agrees with you and no
matter how much you shout and insult people that will not change. I am
fully aware of the realities of the situation I am in and about the
realities of the choice I made nine months ago, shouting at me will not
change that, it will just make me think of you as an even bigger idiot.
Now, I don't know if it is the case where you come from but referring to
people by just their surname is insulting here in Ireland so kindly
don't do it again.
Thank you,
Bart.
Dakota Jack wrote:
So you are ecstatic that your design choice of Struts 9 months ago has been
determined by the Struts committers to be a bad choice? You should fit
right in around here with your logic. Webworks has not be "included",
Busschots. Webworks, which was around when you made your BRILLIANT choice,
is now kicking your choice out the door.
On 3/29/06, Bart Busschots <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Right, as I see it this all boils down to Jon whinning that the struts
guys are adopting WebWorks for the basis of struts 2 rather than Struts
1.X. So the problem seems to be that two groups trying to achieve the
same thing have come together and merged. Hang on a sec .... that's NOT
a problem. The struts guys saw that webworks was good and adopted it.
GREAT, BRILLIANT! They are DOING WHAT IS BEST FOR THE USERS, i.e. US!
Just because you switch to a new track does NOT mean you have stagnated!
It means you are moving foward in a positive manner. How on earth can
that be a bad thing and how on earth can such obvious progress forward
be stagnation!
By Jon's "logic" Windows development stagnated when the Windows ME
code-base was abandoned and MS have serious questions to answer as to
why they moved on to a better technology (WinNT Code Base). Not to
Mention Apple really stagnated when they moved from OS 9 to the NeXT
based OS X.
Besides, since I started using struts about 9 months ago Struts have
moved on at least 5 minor versions, that's hardly stagnent now is it!
Stuts is moving FORWARD, the struts code base has been STRENGTHENED by
the inclusion of WebWorks, where on earth is this mythical stagnation?
The only thing here that seems stagnent to me are John's posts. They are
just the same thing over and over and over and over and over .........
again. We get it Jon, we know what you think, it's just that not
everyone agrees with you and no matter how many times you say the same
thing everyone will NEVER agree with you!
This topic is dead, it has been for weeks, can we now please do the
honourable thing and bury it!
Bart.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
"You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back."
~Dakota Jack~
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
