On 6/12/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And, if we are creating a SAF1 emulator, why not just use SAF1? Let SAF1 handles the *.dos, and let SAF2 handle the *.actions.
Having two frameworks to keep track of instead of one, each with their own idiosyncracies and release trains, is not making life better for the engineers that have to maintain that kind of a beast. -Ted. Craig
