Done. http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/SHALE-190
Adam Brod Product Development Team "Craig McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/12/2006 06:52 PM Please respond to "Struts Users Mailing List" <user@struts.apache.org> To "Struts Users Mailing List" <user@struts.apache.org> cc Subject Re: [Shale] tiger - abstract base class? On 6/12/06, Adam Brod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi- > > I want to define a managed property in an abstract base class using > shale-tiger annotations. Then the subclasses can use the same property. You're trying to use @Property on the abstract base class, right? Is this possible? So far, it doesn't seem to work. Jpa allows for mapped > superclasses that are abstract, so the same thing would be great in JSF as > well. > > http://java.sun.com/javaee/5/docs/api/javax/persistence/MappedSuperclass.html Because the Tiger extensions processes annotations at runtime, it should actually be able to figure this out without additional annotations. Right now, it only looks at the specified managed bean class itself. Could you please file an issue asking for this improvement? http://issues.apache.org/struts/ Thanks, > > Adam Brod > Product Development Team Craig Disclaimer: This electronic mail and any attachments are confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this email, and destroy all copies of this email and any attachments. Thank you.
