Good point. We tend to wrap our tiles usage into the JSPs using <tiles:insert> tags.
You forward to tiles using path="tile.definition.name" without the beginning "/", correct? I think I'll add an additional attribute of "tile" that can be used in place of "path" that would not do the absolute path resolution. Would that solve the problem? -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 3:24 PM To: user@struts.apache.org Subject: RE: [ANN] Hoople 1.0 Nathan Voxland announced: > Hoople has worked well for us by allowing us to configure the > action mappings in separate XML config files that are stored > where the URL would be on the filesystem if Struts wasn't > there. There are also several other features that make > working with the action mappings easier, like being able to > use relative paths and assuming that forwards have a path > that is the same as the request URL but with a .jsp extension > if the path is not specified. Hmmm... What about tiles? I tend to forward to a tile rather than a JSP. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
