Greg Reddin ha scritto:
<template-stuff/>
<ui:insert name="header">Default Header Stuff</ui:insert>
<more-template-stuff/>
<ui:insert name="body">Default Body Stuff</ui:insert>
<still-more-template-stuff/>
<ui:insert name="footer">Default Footer Stuff</ui:insert>
Then you extend it with a page like this:
<ui:composition template="/layout.xhtml">
<ui:define name="body">
Extended/Overridden Body Content
</ui:define>
</ui:composition>
It seems that <tiles:put> already accepts the body so it "potentially"
could work (though it seems that Mehdi made a test and it doesn't work).
Anyway the "default" part should be implemented.
It could be something like:
<tiles:insert name="myAttribute" type="attribute">
Default content
</tiles:insert>
Or
<tiles:insert name="myAttribute" type="attribute"
defaultValue="/mydefault.jsp" defaultType="template" />
Antonio
P.S.: Should we use [Tiles 2.0] when referring to new Tiles? I asked
this because the site it is written to use [tiles] instead (anyway
[Tiles 2.0] is much clearer).
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
